Home / Confusing words / deteriorate vs exacerbateNo. 0309

deteriorate vs exacerbate

Deteriorate and exacerbate both point downward, but their grammar sets them apart. To deteriorate is to become worse on its own — a building, health, relations, weather: no one does it, the thing simply declines. To exacerbate is to make something worse — an agent deepens an existing problem. Deteriorate is intransitive (it takes no object); exacerbate is transitive (it always needs one). Things deteriorate; people and factors exacerbate them.

Quick rule
becomes worse by itself, no objectdeteriorate
makes an existing bad thing worse, needs an objectexacerbate
deteriorate

Fig. 1adeteriorate.

/dɪˈtɪriəreɪt//dɪˈtɪəriəreɪt/·verb
vs
exacerbate

Fig. 1bexacerbate.

/ɪɡˈzæsərbeɪt//ɪɡˈzæsəbeɪt/·verb

The heart of this pair is transitivity. Deteriorate, from Latin deterior, 'worse', describes a thing sliding from a better state to a worse one by itself — paint deteriorates, eyesight deteriorates, discipline deteriorates. It needs no cause named and takes no object. Exacerbate needs both: an existing bad situation and an agent that worsens it. So a patient's condition deteriorates (it declines), while a delayed diagnosis exacerbates it (something makes it worse). Getting this wrong produces the classic error 'the war deteriorated the economy' — deteriorate cannot take that object; the war exacerbated, or worsened, the economy, which itself deteriorated.

01What each means

deteriorate

To deteriorate is to get worse gradually — and usually to keep getting worse. Buildings deteriorate without maintenance, health deteriorates with age, relations deteriorate after an insult. The word implies a process rather than an event: not a collapse but a slide, often one that accelerates once it begins, because each loss makes the next easier. What deteriorates was once in good condition; the word always carries the memory of better days.

exacerbate

To exacerbate is to make a bad thing worse — the exact mirror of mitigate. The Latin exacerbare means 'to make bitter' (acerbus is the root of 'acerbic'), and the word's particular cruelty is that it so often describes help gone wrong: scratching exacerbates the itch, hasty fixes exacerbate the bug, emergency borrowing exacerbates the debt. What exacerbates rarely intends to — which is why the word travels with 'only', as in measures that only exacerbated the crisis.

02At a glance
deteriorateexacerbate
Grammarintransitive — takes no objecttransitive — always needs one
Who does itno one; the thing declines by itselfan agent or factor worsens it
The picturea slide from a better past statean existing bad thing made worse
Classic subjectshealth, buildings, relations, weathera problem, tension, an injury, inequality
Fromdeterior, 'worse'exacerbare, 'to make harsh'
The error to avoid'deteriorate the economy' (no object allowed)— (object required)
03How to remember

The self-shedding bridge and the worsened fever. Deteriorate needs no hand — the bridge loses boards faster and faster all by itself, a decline that feeds on itself. Exacerbate needs both a wound and an agent — the medicine that deepens a fever already burning. Ask whether the thing worsens by itself or is worsened by something. On its own, no object: deteriorate. Made worse by an agent, with an object: exacerbate. Conditions deteriorate; neglect exacerbates them.

04In use

deteriorate

  • iHis health deteriorated sharply over the winter.
  • iiRelations between the two countries have deteriorated.
  • iiiLeft outdoors, the timber deteriorated within a year.

exacerbate

  • iThe strike exacerbated the shortage of parts.
  • iiCutting the budget exacerbated an already fragile service.
  • iiiLoud criticism only exacerbated his nerves.

Deteriorate belongs especially to health and diplomacy — a patient's condition deteriorates, relations between states deteriorate — where it names a slow slide watched with concern, and its noun, deterioration, is common. Exacerbation, by contrast, is a rare and awkward noun, so writers usually recast exacerbate into a clause ('which made it worse') rather than reach for the noun form at all. How exacerbate differs from aggravate and escalate — its near-neighbours in worsening — is drawn on the pages in the 'Related' list below.

05TOEFL & IELTS

The transitive/intransitive error here is a real, penalised one. 'The war deteriorated the economy' is wrong — deteriorate never takes an object; write 'the economy deteriorated' or 'the war exacerbated the recession'. Keep the pair straight in cause-and-effect sentences: the thing deteriorates, and a named factor exacerbates or worsens it. Worsen is the reliable fallback because it accepts both structures, but deteriorate and exacerbate are the higher-band words when their grammar is used correctly.

06Asked
What is the difference between deteriorate and exacerbate?
Grammar, above all. Deteriorate is intransitive — a thing becomes worse by itself, like the bridge in the scene above shedding boards with no hand on it, and it takes no object. Exacerbate is transitive — an agent makes an existing bad thing worse, and it always needs that object. So a patient's condition deteriorates, while a missed diagnosis exacerbates it. One declines on its own; the other is worsened by something.
Can you 'deteriorate' something? Is 'the war deteriorated the economy' correct?
No — that sentence is a common error. Deteriorate is intransitive and cannot take an object, so it can only describe the economy declining by itself: 'the economy deteriorated'. To say the war did it, you need a transitive verb: 'the war exacerbated the recession' or 'the war worsened the economy'. If you want to name the cause and its target in one clause, deteriorate is the wrong verb.
Can something exacerbate deterioration?
Yes, and the sentence shows the pair working together. The thing deteriorates — declines on its own — while an external factor exacerbates that decline, deepening it. 'The roof deteriorated over decades, and the storms exacerbated the damage.' Notice how the grammar sorts the roles: deteriorate has no object (the roof declines), exacerbate takes one (the storms worsen the damage). Cause and process, each with its own verb.
Does deteriorate need an external cause?
No — that is much of its point. Deteriorate describes something worsening unattended, from a better past state, whether or not any cause is named: paint deteriorates, eyesight deteriorates, morale deteriorates. Exacerbate always implies an agent, because someone or something must do the worsening. So if you mean a thing simply got worse over time with no one to blame, deteriorate is exactly right, and exacerbate would wrongly imply a culprit.
Deteriorate, exacerbate, or aggravate — which for a worsening problem?
If the problem worsens by itself, deteriorate — it takes no object. If something makes it worse, exacerbate or aggravate, both transitive, with aggravate the more everyday word. The finer split between aggravate and exacerbate is drawn on the aggravate vs exacerbate page in the 'Related' list below. The quick test is whether you can name a doer: no doer, deteriorate; a doer, one of the other two.
Are deteriorate and worsen the same?
Close, but worsen is more flexible. Both mean become worse, and worsen shares deteriorate's intransitive use ('conditions worsened'). But worsen also works transitively — 'the delay worsened the shortage' — where deteriorate cannot follow. So worsen bridges the pair: it can describe the decline like deteriorate, or the worsening-by-an-agent like exacerbate. That makes it the safe choice whenever you are unsure which grammar a sentence needs.
Related